Thursday

Hunter Moore, Isanyoneup and Cyber Rape

This is the blog post I made anonymously on Feb 21, 2012 this year. This post was immediately hacked (within two days). And then someone tried to give me a computer virus. Someone apparently got a Google alert and was upset that I was releasing this information. Since only three people had seen the post (according to website statistics), I have a pretty good idea who the hacker was or to whom he or she was connected.

I am posting the information again, although not anonymously this time, because the website Isanyoneup.com has been removed from the Internet. I hope Congress will pass legislation, so people are no longer victimized in this way.

Thanks,

Charlotte Laws

___  

The information below was originally posted anonymously on Feb 21, 2012 on an obscure website.

Cyber rape is a disturbing trend in which websites upload copyright-protected naked images in order to trash reputations and end careers; and of course, make money. I spent a heart-wrenching week consoling victims. Some whimpered into the phone and begged for help. All had small and terrified voices, but psychological trauma is common after rape. Although the perpetrator had never touched their flesh, he had inflicted violence in much the same way as a traditional offender might. 

The cyber rapist is Hunter Moore of the website, IsAnyoneUp.com. Some of his most ardent supporters proudly label him this way. Moore posts naked photos of ordinary people, which he links to their Facebook or Twitter accounts, often indicating their hometown and place of work. Beneath the pictures, Moore’s followers post crude and misogynistic remarks. Victims might be taunted as “fat cows,” “creatures with nasty teeth,” “ugly whores,” “white trash sluts” and “whales.” One commenter says, ”Jesus, someone call Greenpeace and get her back in the water.” Moore has posted pictures of a partially blind paraplegic, a kindergarten teacher, and a mentally incapacitated woman, among others. The website is not about pornography; it is about hurting others. 

Moore brags that he is a “professional life ruiner” and “scummy” and that his website is “pure evil”; and he maintains that his victims—both male and female—asked to be abused. In his view, those who snap sexy pictures in the privacy of their bedroom are sluts and deserve to lose their jobs, embarrass their families and find themselves forever ruined. When a person’s name and naked body gets indexed into Google and other search engines, it is almost impossible to remove. Like an infectious disease; it spreads quickly and can prove fatal to reputation, especially when foreign websites snag the images and further disseminate them.

Moore chooses his victims carefully. He does not post well-to-do, A-list celebrities—although he claims to possess such photos--because he fears they could nail him with a pricey lawsuit. He preys on the vulnerable: those who lack resources or “connections.” Copyright lawyer Marc Randozza says that bringing a lawsuit to fruition against Moore could cost $60,000. Although a judge can award a victim as much as $150,000 per copyright infringement and although Moore would most probably lose in court, Randozza thinks Moore might hide his assets. This would leave plaintiffs with nothing and feeling further exploited.  

Mainstream media is often wrong about Moore because he has a whimsical relationship with the truth. Moore does not live in San Francisco, nor does his lawyer live in Las Vegas, as he claims. Moore rarely removes photos when asked, begged or served with legal letters. He ignores copyright infringement; and his website is not largely a platform for “revenge porn,” as most articles say. “Revenge porn” occurs when an angry ex submits nude photos of a former boyfriend, girlfriend, husband or wife in order to trash the other person’s reputation.

I embarked upon an investigation of Moore and his website in January 2012. I randomly chose 25 individuals who had been uploaded onto the site within a 14-day period. Most of these folks were difficult to find. Victims of cyber rape tend to blame themselves, crawl into an emotional fetal position and shut down their above-board online presence. They may close their Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn pages, not realizing that these accounts serve as a partial buffer against the disturbing data from Moore’s site. When all positive information about them vanishes, only the negative remains. It becomes easier for their employer or grandmother to do a Google search and to find the nude photos and offensive comments. 

My findings were astonishing: a full 40% of the victims I located had been hacked only days before their photos were loaded onto the site. In most cases, the scam began through Facebook and ended when the thief gained access to the victim’s email account. The hacker did not nab credit card information. He or she seemed to have only one goal: to steal images for “Is Anyone Up?”

One victim had never shown her photos to anyone, nor did she intend to. She had taken the shots in the mirror alone with her cell phone and sent them to her email account in order to store them on her computer. Another victim had emailed her topless photo only to her husband; another had sent her shot only to her doctor. All victims promptly asked Moore to remove the illegal material from his website; he would not. Although the victims owned the copyright (in that they had taken the shots of themselves), they registered the pictures with the US Copyright office in Washington, DC, and their lawyers sent “cease and desist letters” (DMCA takedown requests) to Moore; he ignored these as well. 

In addition to the “hacked” victims, I found three people (a full 12% of my sample group) who claim their names and faces are posted next to nude bodies that are not actually theirs. “If my ex-husband finds out, I will lose custody of my children,” a middle-aged woman wept into the phone. “I have sent 20 letters to Hunter Moore. It’s not me. He won’t take the photos down; and I don’t know what to do.” Toronto Maple Leaf hockey player Mike Zigomanis (who was not part of my investigation) also claims that the faceless penis pictures next to his name on the website are of someone else. The scandal is negatively affecting his career; a Google search with Zigomanis’ name plus the word “nude” garners 30,000 results.

Through my investigation, I found nine victims of revenge porn (36% of my test group) and three “self-submits” (12%). “Self-submits,” of course, are not victims at all; they are individuals who willingly sent their images to Moore. In the end, it was disturbing to learn that over half of the folks from my sample group were either criminally hacked or posted next to body parts that were not theirs. In addition, copyright infringement on the site was pervasive. Besides the nude shots, it was clear that many fully clothed photos were owned by professional photographers and media outlets.

Moore is not the only cyber rapist in town. IsAnybodyDown.com and WalktheShame.com have popped up in recent weeks, no doubt with hopes of elbowing in on some of Moore’s profits. With an increase in “life ruining” sites, there will no doubt be an increase in victims.   

Although I thought the recently-shelved Stop Internet Piracy Act (SOPA) was problematic; I urge Congress to draft an amendment, which I call “SOPA: SEX.” This legislation would pertain only to images and videos depicting nudity or sex; and it would require websites to immediately remove questionable material (when alerted about copyright infringement) until a court rules on the issue.

“SOPA-SEX” legislation would shift the burden onto website operators, and away from cyber rape victims, who today must embark upon a costly race against the fast-paced web in an effort to preserve their reputation. With passage of “SOPA-SEX,” naked and copyrighted images would not multiply in the cyber sphere for weeks (or months) while lawyers attempt to haul Hunter Moore and his ilk into court. “SOPA-SEX” would be supported by Silicon Valley and Hollywood, by Republicans and Democrats, and most of all, by regular Americans. It is an area in which everyone—except predators—can agree.

Let’s end the shame game. Let’s stop cyber rape. And let’s make Hunter Moore find a new career. 

Labels: , ,

8 Comments:

Anonymous mike reynolds said...

While I agree with many of the points that you made here you really need to see and understand the other side of the story here to be taken seriously as do the people who are running these websites. I doubt either side will ever back down so it is about meeting half way

8:11 AM  
Anonymous mike reynolds said...

and did you ever stop to maybe give your actions, in this case publishing this post, a second thought. In this case there are probably how many thousands of people who may read this post and you have just gave the sites in question a huge promo and no doubt made the situation you are complaining about even worse. Without all the publicity these sites will quickly die

8:29 AM  
Anonymous Charlotte Laws said...

Thanks for your comments, Mike. Unfortunately, these sites do not quickly die. They are spreading. I honestly don't see the good that these sites do. The fleeting pleasure of a few people to harass and hurt others is not a benefit to society. I agree with your point that writing about it could qualify as "promoting" in some sense, but I feel the issue needs to be widely discussed if legislators are going to be convinced that laws should be put in place to protect victims of cyber rape. After I wrote this blog piece in Feb., I contacted additional victims of the site. I have contacted 40 people in all. Those who had not self-submitted were in great pain over this ordeal, and their pain continues as they try to get their names and images off the fast-paced web.

12:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am a legitimate rape victim and this is NOT worse than actual rape. These people chose to take nude pictures of themselves and put them on the internet in some forum, whether it be private or not, it is still the internet. It is disgusting that you would compare these people to actual rape victims. While I agree the the site should be taken down and these people were victimized, it is not comparable to rape whatsoever, and it is frankly adding insult to injury to ACTUAL rape victims.

10:58 PM  
Blogger Charlotte Laws said...

I never said cyber rape was worse than real rape. Hunter Moore said that; and he and his followers have somehow decided to try to convince everyone that I said it. The show was taped via Skype so I could not hear or see him clearly, so when he said “Cyber rape is worse than rape,” I assumed he was serious. I thought it was an odd thing to say, but figured he was entitled to his opinion. Those were never my words; they were his words.

In my view, real rape is, of course, worse. However, there is one aspect of cyber rape that is worse: it is wholly public. Victims of (real) rape often don’t come forward because they don’t want to be victimized again. They don’t want anyone to know what has happened to them.

Victims of cyber rape can’t make that decision. Their nude photos are not only published with their name, job information, city, etc., but these photos quickly multiply on the Internet. The person is victimized again and again day after day. After the photos appear on Isanyoneup, Hunter Moore’s followers send harassing emails to the victim and her employer and family, for days.

I contacted three teachers and I was told the school board, principal and family members were emailed the nude photos again and again with nasty comments like ”Fire that slut.”

For many victims, the nude photos were the first thing (second, third, and fourth, etc). to appear on Google under their names. In other words, their reputation was entirely trashed overnight (and possibly forever) because of photos that legally belonged to them. They owned the copyright (in that they had taken the photo themselves). Yet, when they served Moore with legal notices to remove the photos, he refused to comply with copyright law.

It is outrageous for Hunter Moore and his followers to say that it is the woman’s fault when her private photos (sometimes never sent to anyone) end up on his site. That is akin to saying that a woman who walks down an alley deserves to be raped. By making a comment like that, they are offending both real rape and cyber rape victims. Anonymous, why aren’t you criticizing Hunter Moore? You are here criticizing me? Have you totally drunk his Kool-Aid?

If you look at the definition of “cyber rape” in the urban dictionary, it says “The act of raping via the Internet. Analogous to cyber sex, except one of the two people does not want the sexually oriented messages. The receiving party feels harassed and scared.”

Posting someone’s copyrighted nude pictures without their permission (as happened on Is Anyone Up) is clearly cyber rape. Plus Hunter Moore and his followers posted comments under the pictures, saying things like “rape that whore” etc. There was much violence on the site.

I still remember when Hunter Moore posted, “F__k or Kill her?” under some woman’s nude pictures. Then Moore’s followers wrote things like “Kill her,” “F__k her then kill her,” “ugly whore,” etc. all the way down the page.

It is very odd that you are criticizing me rather than Hunter Moore, who clearly hates women and enjoyed abusing and harassing them on his website. He posted a legally blind paraplegic, yet you are criticizing me rather than him?

Also, keep in mind that some people who appeared on Moore’s site had never sent their photos to anyone: they were hacked. One girl had taken the photo after a boob job. There were bandages on her breasts. That shot was hacked and appeared on the site. A person has a right to take photos of herself; she is not at fault if someone steals them. Photos are taken for doctors, for weight loss reasons, for personal use. A person who has items stolen from her house is not blamed even if she has one deadbolt, rather than two. Hunter Moore blames the women with hopes of shifting all blame away from himself. Of course, this further victimizes them.

Charlotte Laws
(to be continued)

6:58 AM  
Blogger Charlotte Laws said...

Also, keep in mind that some of the people who appeared on the site had never taken a nude photo of themselves at all. Their head was posted with another person’s nude body parts. Explain to me how it is their fault when their reputation is trashed? Hunter Moore never addresses this scenario because he cannot figure out how to blame these victims. He dodges the question.

In the future, I hope you will place criticism where it belongs: squarely on Hunter Moore.

6:58 AM  
Anonymous Liza L. said...

Great work in uncovering these crimes, Charlotte. I really feel for these women who have had their lives casually shredded. You have stood up to something truly ugly. I hope the FBI will bury Hunter Moore.

10:07 AM  
Anonymous Wendy J said...

Cyber rape is an "on point" description for this "crime" or offense. I applaud you Charlotte for everything you did to bring this into the open.

7:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home